Discussion about this post

User's avatar
MVPQ's avatar

Sharman’s book on Company States is much better and more interesting than his MR book. He is also quite a mediocre and repetitive writer.

Also, I find it weird and disappointing how little theories of Military Revolution interact with the growing dominance of early-modern navies. Navies were one area where Europeans achieved unambiguous global domination and vital to military conflicts of the period. They also played a much larger role in colonialism than pike-and-shotte formations

Expand full comment
William Burns's avatar

I realize you already have a lot on your plate, but I'd love to see a discussion of the relationship between the (mostly European) "military revolution" debates and the (mostly not European) "gunpowder empire" literature.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts